Which has grown faster, ACA or PL?

Over the past five years, PL grew revenue faster — ACA at a 8.38% CAGR versus PL at 22.15%.

Does ACA or PL pay a bigger dividend?

ACA pays a dividend (0.14% yield) while PL does not currently pay one.

Is ACA or PL more profitable?

ACA runs the higher net margin — ACA at 7.88% versus PL at -111.17%.

Which has been the better investment, ACA or PL?

Over the past 5-year, ACA delivered the higher annualized total return — ACA at 22.72% versus PL at 17.85%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Arcosa, Inc. (ACA) vs Planet Labs PBC (PL)

ACA leads on 8 of 10 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Arcosa, Inc. and Planet Labs PBC across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 16, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

ACA

Arcosa, Inc.

$7.12B

$145.00IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 16, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Planet Labs PBC

$7.35B

$22.09IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 16, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — ACA vs PL

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 5y

ACA +129.2%PL +127.3%ACA compounded faster

ACA PL

ACA vs PL: by the numbers

•PL is the larger company ($7.35B vs $7.12B market cap).
•ACA is profitable (7.88% net margin) while PL runs a net loss (-111.17%).
•PL grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.15% vs 8.38% CAGR).
•ACA pays a dividend (0.14% yield) while PL does not currently pay one.

Which is better, ACA or PL?

Metric tally: ACA 8 · PL 2

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthPL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityACA(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ACA	PL
P/E ratio	31.98	—
Forward P/E	33.86	—
P/S ratio	2.52●	25.64
P/B ratio	2.71●	19.39
PEG ratio	0.21	—
EV / EBITDA	15.27	—
FCF yield	3.35%●	0.55%

Profitability

Metric	ACA	PL
Gross margin	22.77%	55.51%●
Operating margin	11.81%●	-31.94%
Net margin	7.88%●	-111.17%
ROE	8.45%●	-84.09%
ROIC	6.71%●	-13.91%

Dividends

Metric	ACA	PL
Dividend yield	0.14%	—
Payout ratio	4.71%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ACA	PL
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	8.38%	22.15%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	14.08%	—
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-0.26%	—
Total return CAGR (5Y)	22.72%●	17.85%

Frequently asked

Which is better, ACA or PL?: It depends on your goal. growth: PL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: ACA (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, ACA leads 8 to 2.
Which has grown faster, ACA or PL?: Over the past five years, PL grew revenue faster — ACA at a 8.38% CAGR versus PL at 22.15%.
Does ACA or PL pay a bigger dividend?: ACA pays a dividend (0.14% yield) while PL does not currently pay one.
Is ACA or PL more profitable?: ACA runs the higher net margin — ACA at 7.88% versus PL at -111.17%.
Which has been the better investment, ACA or PL?: Over the past 5-year, ACA delivered the higher annualized total return — ACA at 22.72% versus PL at 17.85%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ACA analysis Full PL analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Arcosa P/E ratio Planet Labs PBC P/E ratio Arcosa dividend yield Planet Labs PBC dividend yield Arcosa ROE Planet Labs PBC ROE Arcosa operating margin Planet Labs PBC operating margin Arcosa revenue growth Planet Labs PBC revenue growth Arcosa free cash flow Planet Labs PBC free cash flow

Arcosa & Planet Labs PBC appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 16, 2026.