Arcosa, Inc. (ACA) vs Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH)
BAH leads on 9 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Arcosa, Inc. and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
ACA
Arcosa, Inc.
$144.34Industrials
BAH
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
$62.68Industrials
Total return — ACA vs BAH
growth of $100 · last 8yACA +600.1%BAH +25.9%ACA compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
ACA BAH
ACA vs BAH: by the numbers
- •BAH is the larger company ($7.24B vs $7.08B market cap).
- •BAH trades at the lower earnings multiple (9.08 vs 31.86 P/E).
- •ACA converts more revenue to profit (7.88% vs 7.57% net margin).
- •ACA grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.38% vs 7.38% CAGR).
- •BAH pays the higher dividend yield (3.64% vs 0.14%).
Which is better, ACA or BAH?
Metric tally: ACA 8 · BAH 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueBAH(lower P/E)
GrowthACA(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeBAH(higher dividend yield)
QualityBAH(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ACA | BAH |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 31.86 | 9.08● |
| Forward P/E | 33.74 | 10.32● |
| P/S ratio | 2.52 | 0.67● |
| P/B ratio | 2.70● | 6.85 |
| PEG ratio | 0.21● | 0.25 |
| EV / EBITDA | 15.01 | 9.05● |
| FCF yield | 3.36% | 12.56%● |
Profitability
| Metric | ACA | BAH |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 22.77% | 44.51%● |
| Operating margin | 11.81%● | 9.21% |
| Net margin | 7.88%● | 7.57% |
| ROE | 8.45% | 76.83%● |
| ROIC | 6.71% | 18.60%● |
Dividends
| Metric | ACA | BAH |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.14% | 3.64%● |
| Payout ratio | 4.71% | 33.00% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ACA | BAH |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 8.38%● | 7.38% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 14.08%● | 9.45% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 11.59%● | 8.54% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 19.79%● | -5.32% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, ACA or BAH?
- It depends on your goal. value: BAH (lower P/E); growth: ACA (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: BAH (higher dividend yield); quality: BAH (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, BAH leads 9 to 8.
- Is ACA or BAH cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, BAH is cheaper: ACA trades at a 31.86 P/E and BAH at 9.08.
- Which has grown faster, ACA or BAH?
- Over the past five years, ACA grew revenue faster — ACA at a 8.38% CAGR versus BAH at 7.38%.
- Does ACA or BAH pay a bigger dividend?
- ACA yields 0.14% and BAH yields 3.64% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is ACA or BAH more profitable?
- ACA runs the higher net margin — ACA at 7.88% versus BAH at 7.57%.
- Which has been the better investment, ACA or BAH?
- Over the past 5-year, ACA delivered the higher annualized total return — ACA at 19.79% versus BAH at 9.77%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Arcosa P/E ratioBooz Allen Hamilton P/E ratioArcosa dividend yieldBooz Allen Hamilton dividend yieldArcosa ROEBooz Allen Hamilton ROEArcosa operating marginBooz Allen Hamilton operating marginArcosa revenue growthBooz Allen Hamilton revenue growthArcosa free cash flowBooz Allen Hamilton free cash flow
Arcosa & Booz Allen Hamilton appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 25, 2026.