Abbott Laboratories (ABT) vs Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG)
ISRG leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics, though ABT is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Abbott Laboratories and Intuitive Surgical, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — ABT vs ISRG
growth of $100 · last 26yABT +362.2%ISRG +20149.3%ISRG compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
ABT ISRG
ABT vs ISRG: by the numbers
- •ABT is the larger company ($153.59B vs $145.58B market cap).
- •ABT trades at the lower earnings multiple (24.56 vs 49.83 P/E).
- •ISRG converts more revenue to profit (28.15% vs 13.91% net margin).
- •ISRG grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.39% vs 3.87% CAGR).
- •ABT pays a dividend (2.77% yield) while ISRG does not currently pay one.
Which is better, ABT or ISRG?
Metric tally: ABT 7 · ISRG 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueABT(lower P/E)
GrowthISRG(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityISRG(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | ABT | ISRG |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 24.56● | 49.83 |
| Forward P/E | 14.56● | 34.90 |
| P/S ratio | 3.41● | 13.98 |
| P/B ratio | 2.96● | 8.46 |
| PEG ratio | 2.99● | 3.17 |
| EV / EBITDA | 17.30● | 35.41 |
| FCF yield | 4.79%● | 1.92% |
Profitability
| Metric | ABT | ISRG |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 56.38% | 66.29%● |
| Operating margin | 18.17% | 30.45%● |
| Net margin | 13.91% | 28.15%● |
| ROE | 12.06% | 17.05%● |
| ROIC | 8.43% | 13.71%● |
Dividends
| Metric | ABT | ISRG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.77% | — |
| Payout ratio | 65.24% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ABT | ISRG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 3.87% | 18.39%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 8.22% | 21.51%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -0.61% | 16.61%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -2.49% | 7.37%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, ABT or ISRG?
- It depends on your goal. value: ABT (lower P/E); growth: ISRG (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: ISRG (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, ISRG leads 9 to 7.
- Is ABT or ISRG cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, ABT is cheaper: ABT trades at a 24.56 P/E and ISRG at 49.83.
- Which has grown faster, ABT or ISRG?
- Over the past five years, ISRG grew revenue faster — ABT at a 3.87% CAGR versus ISRG at 18.39%.
- Does ABT or ISRG pay a bigger dividend?
- ABT pays a dividend (2.77% yield) while ISRG does not currently pay one.
- Is ABT or ISRG more profitable?
- ISRG runs the higher net margin — ABT at 13.91% versus ISRG at 28.15%.
- Which has been the better investment, ABT or ISRG?
- Over the past 10-year, ISRG delivered the higher annualized total return — ABT at 10.72% versus ISRG at 19.14%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Abbott Laboratories P/E ratioIntuitive Surgical P/E ratioAbbott Laboratories dividend yieldIntuitive Surgical dividend yieldAbbott Laboratories ROEIntuitive Surgical ROEAbbott Laboratories operating marginIntuitive Surgical operating marginAbbott Laboratories revenue growthIntuitive Surgical revenue growthAbbott Laboratories free cash flowIntuitive Surgical free cash flow
Abbott Laboratories & Intuitive Surgical appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.