Is ABCD or LKQ cheaper?

On trailing earnings, LKQ is cheaper: ABCD trades at a 16.09 P/E and LKQ at 13.05.

Which has grown faster, ABCD or LKQ?

Over the past five years, LKQ grew revenue faster — ABCD at a 1.18% CAGR versus LKQ at 3.37%.

Does ABCD or LKQ pay a bigger dividend?

LKQ pays a dividend (4.57% yield) while ABCD does not currently pay one.

Is ABCD or LKQ more profitable?

ABCD runs the higher net margin — ABCD at 26.87% versus LKQ at 3.71%.

Which has been the better investment, ABCD or LKQ?

Over the past 5-year, ABCD delivered the higher annualized total return — ABCD at 52.20% versus LKQ at -0.85%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Cambium Learning Group, Inc. (ABCD) vs LKQ Corporation (LKQ)

ABCD leads on 7 of 13 compared metrics, though LKQ is the cheaper stock.

A side-by-side comparison of Cambium Learning Group, Inc. and LKQ Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 17, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

ABCD

Cambium Learning Group, Inc.

—

$14.48Consumer Cyclical

LKQ

LKQ Corporation

$6.68B

$26.24Consumer Cyclical

Total return — ABCD vs LKQ

growth of $100 · last 9y

ABCD +296.7%LKQ +161.6%ABCD compounded faster

ABCD LKQ

ABCD vs LKQ: by the numbers

•LKQ trades at the lower earnings multiple (13.05 vs 16.09 P/E).
•ABCD converts more revenue to profit (26.87% vs 3.71% net margin).
•LKQ grew revenue faster over the past five years (3.37% vs 1.18% CAGR).
•LKQ pays a dividend (4.57% yield) while ABCD does not currently pay one.

Which is better, ABCD or LKQ?

Metric tally: ABCD 7 · LKQ 6

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueLKQ(lower P/E)

GrowthLKQ(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityABCD(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ABCD	LKQ
P/E ratio	16.09	13.05●
Forward P/E	—	8.84
P/S ratio	4.37	0.48●
P/B ratio	—	1.04
PEG ratio	0.02●	5.73
EV / EBITDA	17.71	8.44●
FCF yield	5.78%	12.03%●

Profitability

Metric	ABCD	LKQ
Gross margin	72.00%●	37.68%
Operating margin	12.93%●	7.30%
Net margin	26.87%●	3.71%
ROE	-315.25%	8.00%●
ROIC	52.46%●	6.60%

Dividends

Metric	ABCD	LKQ
Dividend yield	—	4.57%
Payout ratio	—	51.06%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ABCD	LKQ
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	1.18%	3.37%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	—	2.28%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	13.57%●	-12.79%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	52.20%●	-9.32%

Frequently asked

Which is better, ABCD or LKQ?: It depends on your goal. value: LKQ (lower P/E); growth: LKQ (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: ABCD (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, ABCD leads 7 to 6.
Is ABCD or LKQ cheaper?: On trailing earnings, LKQ is cheaper: ABCD trades at a 16.09 P/E and LKQ at 13.05.
Which has grown faster, ABCD or LKQ?: Over the past five years, LKQ grew revenue faster — ABCD at a 1.18% CAGR versus LKQ at 3.37%.
Does ABCD or LKQ pay a bigger dividend?: LKQ pays a dividend (4.57% yield) while ABCD does not currently pay one.
Is ABCD or LKQ more profitable?: ABCD runs the higher net margin — ABCD at 26.87% versus LKQ at 3.71%.
Which has been the better investment, ABCD or LKQ?: Over the past 5-year, ABCD delivered the higher annualized total return — ABCD at 52.20% versus LKQ at -0.85%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ABCD analysis Full LKQ analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Cambium Learning P/E ratio LKQ P/E ratio Cambium Learning dividend yield LKQ dividend yield Cambium Learning ROE LKQ ROE Cambium Learning operating margin LKQ operating margin Cambium Learning revenue growth LKQ revenue growth Cambium Learning free cash flow LKQ free cash flow

Cambium Learning & LKQ appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 17, 2026.