Is ABBNY or VRT cheaper?

On trailing earnings, ABBNY is cheaper: ABBNY trades at a 40.34 P/E and VRT at 89.94.

Which has grown faster, ABBNY or VRT?

Over the past five years, VRT grew revenue faster — ABBNY at a 5.91% CAGR versus VRT at 18.86%.

Does ABBNY or VRT pay a bigger dividend?

ABBNY yields 1.09% and VRT yields 0.06% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is ABBNY or VRT more profitable?

VRT runs the higher net margin — ABBNY at 13.86% versus VRT at 14.37%.

Which has been the better investment, ABBNY or VRT?

Over the past 5-year, VRT delivered the higher annualized total return — ABBNY at 21.18% versus VRT at 68.02%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

ABB Ltd (ABBNY) vs Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT)

VRT leads on 9 of 17 compared metrics, though ABBNY is the cheaper stock.

A side-by-side comparison of ABB Ltd and Vertiv Holdings Co across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 23, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Total return — ABBNY vs VRT

growth of $100 · last 8y

ABBNY +380.4%VRT +3534.1%VRT compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

ABBNY VRT

ABBNY vs VRT: by the numbers

•ABBNY is the larger company ($199.15B vs $137.50B market cap).
•ABBNY trades at the lower earnings multiple (40.34 vs 89.94 P/E).
•VRT converts more revenue to profit (14.37% vs 13.86% net margin).
•VRT grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.86% vs 5.91% CAGR).
•ABBNY pays the higher dividend yield (1.09% vs 0.06%).

Which is better, ABBNY or VRT?

Metric tally: ABBNY 8 · VRT 9

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueABBNY(lower P/E)

GrowthVRT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeABBNY(higher dividend yield)

QualityVRT(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ABBNY	VRT
P/E ratio	40.34●	89.94
Forward P/E	31.96●	40.70
P/S ratio	5.59●	12.94
P/B ratio	13.53●	33.07
PEG ratio	1.32	0.28●
EV / EBITDA	27.98●	60.77
FCF yield	2.39%●	1.65%

Profitability

Metric	ABBNY	VRT
Gross margin	40.09%●	36.16%
Operating margin	17.22%	18.54%●
Net margin	13.86%	14.37%●
ROE	33.54%	36.71%●
ROIC	15.49%	18.55%●

Dividends

Metric	ABBNY	VRT
Dividend yield	1.09%●	0.06%
Payout ratio	46.03%	6.45%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ABBNY	VRT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	5.91%	18.86%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	74.53%	79.41%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	17.42%	41.85%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	28.61%	68.02%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, ABBNY or VRT?: It depends on your goal. value: ABBNY (lower P/E); growth: VRT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: ABBNY (higher dividend yield); quality: VRT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, VRT leads 9 to 8.
Is ABBNY or VRT cheaper?: On trailing earnings, ABBNY is cheaper: ABBNY trades at a 40.34 P/E and VRT at 89.94.
Which has grown faster, ABBNY or VRT?: Over the past five years, VRT grew revenue faster — ABBNY at a 5.91% CAGR versus VRT at 18.86%.
Does ABBNY or VRT pay a bigger dividend?: ABBNY yields 1.09% and VRT yields 0.06% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is ABBNY or VRT more profitable?: VRT runs the higher net margin — ABBNY at 13.86% versus VRT at 14.37%.
Which has been the better investment, ABBNY or VRT?: Over the past 5-year, VRT delivered the higher annualized total return — ABBNY at 21.18% versus VRT at 68.02%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ABBNY analysis Full VRT analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

ABB P/E ratio Vertiv P/E ratio ABB dividend yield Vertiv dividend yield ABB ROE Vertiv ROE ABB operating margin Vertiv operating margin ABB revenue growth Vertiv revenue growth ABB free cash flow Vertiv free cash flow

ABB & Vertiv appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 23, 2026.