Which has grown faster, AAP or MSC?

Over the past five years, MSC grew revenue faster — AAP at a -3.17% CAGR versus MSC at 69.81%.

Does AAP or MSC pay a bigger dividend?

AAP pays a dividend (1.82% yield) while MSC does not currently pay one.

Is AAP or MSC more profitable?

AAP runs the higher net margin — AAP at 0.51% versus MSC at -5.63%.

Which has been the better investment, AAP or MSC?

Over the past 5-year, AAP delivered the higher annualized total return — AAP at -8.90% versus MSC at -30.17%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Advance Auto Parts, Inc. (AAP) vs Studio City International Holdings Limited (MSC)

MSC leads on 7 of 11 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Advance Auto Parts, Inc. and Studio City International Holdings Limited across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 10, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

AAP

Advance Auto Parts, Inc.

$3.50B

$57.95Consumer Cyclical

MSC

Studio City International Holdings Limited

$87M

$1.76Consumer Cyclical

Total return — AAP vs MSC

growth of $100 · last 8y

AAP -64.5%MSC -88.6%AAP compounded faster

AAP MSC

AAP vs MSC: by the numbers

•AAP is the larger company ($3.50B vs $87M market cap).
•AAP is profitable (0.51% net margin) while MSC runs a net loss (-5.63%).
•MSC grew revenue faster over the past five years (69.81% vs -3.17% CAGR).
•AAP pays a dividend (1.82% yield) while MSC does not currently pay one.

Which is better, AAP or MSC?

Metric tally: AAP 4 · MSC 7

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthMSC(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityMSC(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	AAP	MSC
P/E ratio	76.18	—
Forward P/E	30.28	—
P/S ratio	0.39	0.12●
P/B ratio	1.51	0.17●
EV / EBITDA	10.60	6.89●

Profitability

Metric	AAP	MSC
Gross margin	44.04%	68.05%●
Operating margin	3.16%	11.60%●
Net margin	0.51%●	-5.63%
ROE	1.99%●	-7.94%
ROIC	-1.57%	2.68%●

Dividends

Metric	AAP	MSC
Dividend yield	1.82%	—
Payout ratio	136.99%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	AAP	MSC
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-3.17%	69.81%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-36.67%	—
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-16.51%●	-20.72%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-21.45%●	-30.17%

Frequently asked

Which is better, AAP or MSC?: It depends on your goal. growth: MSC (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: MSC (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MSC leads 7 to 4.
Which has grown faster, AAP or MSC?: Over the past five years, MSC grew revenue faster — AAP at a -3.17% CAGR versus MSC at 69.81%.
Does AAP or MSC pay a bigger dividend?: AAP pays a dividend (1.82% yield) while MSC does not currently pay one.
Is AAP or MSC more profitable?: AAP runs the higher net margin — AAP at 0.51% versus MSC at -5.63%.
Which has been the better investment, AAP or MSC?: Over the past 5-year, AAP delivered the higher annualized total return — AAP at -8.90% versus MSC at -30.17%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full AAP analysis Full MSC analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Advance Auto Parts P/E ratio Studio City International P/E ratio Advance Auto Parts dividend yield Studio City International dividend yield Advance Auto Parts ROE Studio City International ROE Advance Auto Parts operating margin Studio City International operating margin Advance Auto Parts revenue growth Studio City International revenue growth Advance Auto Parts free cash flow Studio City International free cash flow

Advance Auto Parts & Studio City International appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 10, 2026.