Which has grown faster, AAP or MSC?

Over the past five years, MSC grew revenue faster — AAP at a -4.55% CAGR versus MSC at 52.00%.

Does AAP or MSC pay a bigger dividend?

AAP pays a dividend (2.29% yield), while MSC has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is AAP or MSC more profitable?

AAP runs the higher net margin — AAP at 0.97% versus MSC at -7.57%.

How have AAP and MSC total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, AAP delivered -10.99% and MSC delivered -28.60% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Advance Auto Parts, Inc. (AAP) vs Studio City International Holdings Limited (MSC)

A side-by-side comparison of Advance Auto Parts, Inc. and Studio City International Holdings Limited across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 25, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

AAP

Advance Auto Parts, Inc.

$2.63B

$43.63Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Aug 24, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

MSC

Studio City International Holdings Limited

$88M

$1.83Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Aug 24, 2026, 1:23 PM EDT

Total return — AAP vs MSC

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8y

AAP -70.4% (-14.1%/yr)MSC -88.2% (-23.4%/yr)AAP compounded faster over this window

AAP MSC

AAP vs MSC: by the numbers

•AAP is the larger company ($2.63B vs $88M market cap).
•AAP is profitable (0.97% net margin) while MSC runs a net loss (-7.57%).
•MSC grew revenue faster over the past five years (52.00% vs -4.55% CAGR).
•AAP pays a dividend (2.29% yield), while MSC has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	AAP	MSC
P/E ratio	31.80	N/A
Forward P/E	24.02	N/A
P/S ratio	0.31	0.13
P/B ratio	1.18	0.18
EV / EBITDA	9.09	6.87
FCF yield	N/A	41.32%

Profitability

Metric	AAP	MSC
Gross margin	44.66%	61.61%
Operating margin	3.75%	10.86%
Net margin	0.97%	-7.57%
ROE	3.72%	-10.69%
ROIC	3.49%	2.94%

Dividends

Metric	AAP	MSC
Dividend yield	2.29%	N/A
Payout ratio	136.99%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	AAP	MSC
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-4.55%	52.00%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-36.67%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-16.51%	N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-25.04%	-28.60%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, AAP or MSC?: Over the past five years, MSC grew revenue faster — AAP at a -4.55% CAGR versus MSC at 52.00%.
Does AAP or MSC pay a bigger dividend?: AAP pays a dividend (2.29% yield), while MSC has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is AAP or MSC more profitable?: AAP runs the higher net margin — AAP at 0.97% versus MSC at -7.57%.
How have AAP and MSC total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, AAP delivered -10.99% and MSC delivered -28.60% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full AAP analysis Full MSC analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Advance Auto Parts P/E ratio Advance Auto Parts dividend yield Advance Auto Parts ROE Studio City International ROE Advance Auto Parts operating margin Studio City International operating margin Advance Auto Parts revenue growth Studio City International revenue growth Advance Auto Parts free cash flow Studio City International free cash flow

Advance Auto Parts & Studio City International appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 25, 2026.