On trailing earnings, AA is cheaper: AA trades at a 13.56 P/E and WY at 46.02.

Which has grown faster, AA or WY?

Over the past five years, AA grew revenue faster — AA at a 5.08% CAGR versus WY at -3.60%.

Does AA or WY pay a bigger dividend?

AA yields 0.74% and WY yields 3.32% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is AA or WY more profitable?

AA runs the higher net margin — AA at 8.17% versus WY at 5.74%.

Which has been the better investment, AA or WY?

Over the past 10-year, AA delivered the higher annualized total return — AA at 10.48% versus WY at 2.44%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Alcoa Corporation (AA) vs Weyerhaeuser Company (WY)

AA leads on 12 of 15 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Alcoa Corporation and Weyerhaeuser Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 27, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Alcoa Corporation

$14.25B

$54.10Basic Materials

Weyerhaeuser Company

$18.25B

$25.31Basic Materials

Total return — AA vs WY

growth of $100 · last 30y

AA +66.6%WY -40.4%AA compounded faster

AA WY

AA vs WY: by the numbers

•WY is the larger company ($18.25B vs $14.25B market cap).
•AA trades at the lower earnings multiple (13.56 vs 46.02 P/E).
•AA converts more revenue to profit (8.17% vs 5.74% net margin).
•AA grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.08% vs -3.60% CAGR).
•WY pays the higher dividend yield (3.32% vs 0.74%).

Which is better, AA or WY?

Metric tally: AA 12 · WY 3

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueAA(lower P/E)

GrowthAA(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeWY(higher dividend yield)

QualityAA(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	AA	WY
P/E ratio	13.56●	46.02
Forward P/E	6.85●	73.57
P/S ratio	1.14●	2.64
P/B ratio	2.11	1.94●
PEG ratio	0.01	—
EV / EBITDA	13.77●	22.49
FCF yield	2.00%	—

Profitability

Metric	AA	WY
Gross margin	15.20%●	13.41%
Operating margin	3.82%	7.70%●
Net margin	8.17%●	5.74%
ROE	15.15%●	4.21%
ROIC	6.12%●	2.93%

Dividends

Metric	AA	WY
Dividend yield	0.74%	3.32%●
Payout ratio	8.95%	186.67%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	AA	WY
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	5.08%●	-3.60%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	20.38%●	-15.91%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	13.41%●	-17.08%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	9.66%●	-2.57%

Frequently asked

Which is better, AA or WY?: It depends on your goal. value: AA (lower P/E); growth: AA (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: WY (higher dividend yield); quality: AA (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, AA leads 12 to 3.
Is AA or WY cheaper?: On trailing earnings, AA is cheaper: AA trades at a 13.56 P/E and WY at 46.02.
Which has grown faster, AA or WY?: Over the past five years, AA grew revenue faster — AA at a 5.08% CAGR versus WY at -3.60%.
Does AA or WY pay a bigger dividend?: AA yields 0.74% and WY yields 3.32% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is AA or WY more profitable?: AA runs the higher net margin — AA at 8.17% versus WY at 5.74%.
Which has been the better investment, AA or WY?: Over the past 10-year, AA delivered the higher annualized total return — AA at 10.48% versus WY at 2.44%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full AA analysis Full WY analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Alcoa P/E ratio Weyerhaeuser P/E ratio Alcoa dividend yield Weyerhaeuser dividend yield Alcoa ROE Weyerhaeuser ROE Alcoa operating margin Weyerhaeuser operating margin Alcoa revenue growth Weyerhaeuser revenue growth Alcoa free cash flow Weyerhaeuser free cash flow

Alcoa & Weyerhaeuser appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 27, 2026.