Alcoa Corporation (AA) vs Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS)
AA leads on 10 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Alcoa Corporation and Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 30, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
AA
Alcoa Corporation
$53.47Basic Materials
RS
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.
$374.43Basic Materials
Total return — AA vs RS
growth of $100 · last 30yAA +64.0%RS +4422.1%RS compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
AA RS
AA vs RS: by the numbers
- •RS is the larger company ($19.11B vs $14.11B market cap).
- •AA trades at the lower earnings multiple (13.40 vs 24.44 P/E).
- •AA converts more revenue to profit (8.17% vs 5.43% net margin).
- •RS grew revenue faster over the past five years (10.33% vs 5.08% CAGR).
- •RS pays the higher dividend yield (1.34% vs 0.75%).
Which is better, AA or RS?
Metric tally: AA 10 · RS 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueAA(lower P/E)
GrowthRS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeRS(higher dividend yield)
QualityRS(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | AA | RS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 13.40● | 24.44 |
| Forward P/E | 6.75● | 17.42 |
| P/S ratio | 1.12● | 1.31 |
| P/B ratio | 2.08● | 2.73 |
| PEG ratio | 0.01● | 1.24 |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.62● | 15.23 |
| FCF yield | 2.02% | 3.15%● |
Profitability
| Metric | AA | RS |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 15.20% | 27.22%● |
| Operating margin | 3.82% | 7.52%● |
| Net margin | 8.17%● | 5.43% |
| ROE | 15.15%● | 11.32% |
| ROIC | 6.12% | 8.16%● |
Dividends
| Metric | AA | RS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.75% | 1.34%● |
| Payout ratio | 8.95% | 35.54% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AA | RS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 5.08% | 10.33%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 20.38%● | 19.64% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 13.41%● | -9.42% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 8.38% | 22.23%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, AA or RS?
- It depends on your goal. value: AA (lower P/E); growth: RS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: RS (higher dividend yield); quality: RS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, AA leads 10 to 7.
- Is AA or RS cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, AA is cheaper: AA trades at a 13.40 P/E and RS at 24.44.
- Which has grown faster, AA or RS?
- Over the past five years, RS grew revenue faster — AA at a 5.08% CAGR versus RS at 10.33%.
- Does AA or RS pay a bigger dividend?
- AA yields 0.75% and RS yields 1.34% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is AA or RS more profitable?
- AA runs the higher net margin — AA at 8.17% versus RS at 5.43%.
- Which has been the better investment, AA or RS?
- Over the past 10-year, RS delivered the higher annualized total return — AA at 10.69% versus RS at 20.00%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Alcoa P/E ratioReliance Steel & Aluminum P/E ratioAlcoa dividend yieldReliance Steel & Aluminum dividend yieldAlcoa ROEReliance Steel & Aluminum ROEAlcoa operating marginReliance Steel & Aluminum operating marginAlcoa revenue growthReliance Steel & Aluminum revenue growthAlcoa free cash flowReliance Steel & Aluminum free cash flow
Alcoa & Reliance Steel & Aluminum appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 30, 2026.