On trailing earnings, AA is cheaper: AA trades at a 17.24 P/E and RL at 26.74.

Which has grown faster, AA or RL?

Over the past five years, RL grew revenue faster — AA at a 5.08% CAGR versus RL at 13.01%.

Does AA or RL pay a bigger dividend?

AA yields 0.58% and RL yields 0.90% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is AA or RL more profitable?

RL runs the higher net margin — AA at 8.17% versus RL at 11.60%.

Which has been the better investment, AA or RL?

Over the past 10-year, RL delivered the higher annualized total return — AA at 13.03% versus RL at 17.77%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Alcoa Corporation (AA) vs Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL)

RL leads on 10 of 16 compared metrics, though AA is the cheaper stock.

A side-by-side comparison of Alcoa Corporation and Ralph Lauren Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Alcoa Corporation

$18.15B

$68.77Basic Materials

Ralph Lauren Corporation

$24.64B

$403.98Consumer Cyclical

Total return — AA vs RL

growth of $100 · last 29y

AA +57.3%RL +1182.5%RL compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

AA RL

AA vs RL: by the numbers

•RL is the larger company ($24.64B vs $18.15B market cap).
•AA trades at the lower earnings multiple (17.24 vs 26.74 P/E).
•RL converts more revenue to profit (11.60% vs 8.17% net margin).
•RL grew revenue faster over the past five years (13.01% vs 5.08% CAGR).
•RL pays the higher dividend yield (0.90% vs 0.58%).

Which is better, AA or RL?

Metric tally: AA 6 · RL 10

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueAA(lower P/E)

GrowthRL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeRL(higher dividend yield)

QualityRL(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	AA	RL
P/E ratio	17.24●	26.74
Forward P/E	8.76●	22.03
P/S ratio	1.44●	3.10
P/B ratio	2.68●	8.86
PEG ratio	0.01●	0.71
EV / EBITDA	11.56●	22.22
FCF yield	1.57%	2.96%●

Profitability

Metric	AA	RL
Gross margin	15.20%	69.87%●
Operating margin	3.82%	14.53%●
Net margin	8.17%	11.60%●
ROE	15.15%	33.13%●
ROIC	6.12%	19.62%●

Dividends

Metric	AA	RL
Dividend yield	0.58%	0.90%●
Payout ratio	8.95%	23.67%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	AA	RL
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	5.08%	13.01%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	20.38%	20.37%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	13.41%	22.25%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	14.06%	29.56%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, AA or RL?: It depends on your goal. value: AA (lower P/E); growth: RL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: RL (higher dividend yield); quality: RL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, RL leads 10 to 6.
Is AA or RL cheaper?: On trailing earnings, AA is cheaper: AA trades at a 17.24 P/E and RL at 26.74.
Which has grown faster, AA or RL?: Over the past five years, RL grew revenue faster — AA at a 5.08% CAGR versus RL at 13.01%.
Does AA or RL pay a bigger dividend?: AA yields 0.58% and RL yields 0.90% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is AA or RL more profitable?: RL runs the higher net margin — AA at 8.17% versus RL at 11.60%.
Which has been the better investment, AA or RL?: Over the past 10-year, RL delivered the higher annualized total return — AA at 13.03% versus RL at 17.77%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full AA analysis Full RL analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Alcoa P/E ratio Ralph Lauren P/E ratio Alcoa dividend yield Ralph Lauren dividend yield Alcoa ROE Ralph Lauren ROE Alcoa operating margin Ralph Lauren operating margin Alcoa revenue growth Ralph Lauren revenue growth Alcoa free cash flow Ralph Lauren free cash flow

Alcoa & Ralph Lauren appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.