Is AA or NTR cheaper?

On trailing earnings, NTR is cheaper: AA trades at a 15.76 P/E and NTR at 13.34.

Which has grown faster, AA or NTR?

Over the past five years, NTR grew revenue faster — AA at a 5.08% CAGR versus NTR at 5.38%.

Does AA or NTR pay a bigger dividend?

AA yields 0.64% and NTR yields 3.34% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is AA or NTR more profitable?

NTR runs the higher net margin — AA at 8.17% versus NTR at 8.58%.

Which has been the better investment, AA or NTR?

Over the past 5-year, AA delivered the higher annualized total return — AA at 11.84% versus NTR at 4.60%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Alcoa Corporation (AA) vs Nutrien Ltd. (NTR)

NTR leads on 12 of 17 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Alcoa Corporation and Nutrien Ltd. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 17, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Alcoa Corporation

$16.47B

$62.87Basic Materials

NTR

Nutrien Ltd.

$31.51B

$65.48Basic Materials

Total return — AA vs NTR

growth of $100 · last 8y

AA +19.1%NTR +19.6%NTR compounded faster

AA NTR

AA vs NTR: by the numbers

•NTR is the larger company ($31.51B vs $16.47B market cap).
•NTR trades at the lower earnings multiple (13.34 vs 15.76 P/E).
•NTR converts more revenue to profit (8.58% vs 8.17% net margin).
•NTR grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.38% vs 5.08% CAGR).
•NTR pays the higher dividend yield (3.34% vs 0.64%).

Which is better, AA or NTR?

Metric tally: AA 5 · NTR 12

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueNTR(lower P/E)

GrowthNTR(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeNTR(higher dividend yield)

QualityNTR(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	AA	NTR
P/E ratio	15.76	13.34●
Forward P/E	8.00●	12.40
P/S ratio	1.32	1.13●
P/B ratio	2.45	1.25●
PEG ratio	0.01●	0.05
EV / EBITDA	10.63	7.09●
FCF yield	1.72%	7.07%●

Profitability

Metric	AA	NTR
Gross margin	15.20%	31.16%●
Operating margin	3.82%	14.15%●
Net margin	8.17%	8.58%●
ROE	15.15%●	9.46%
ROIC	6.12%	6.79%●

Dividends

Metric	AA	NTR
Dividend yield	0.64%	3.34%●
Payout ratio	8.95%	46.10%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	AA	NTR
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	5.08%	5.38%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	20.38%	41.02%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	13.41%●	0.42%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	14.30%●	4.60%

Frequently asked

Which is better, AA or NTR?: It depends on your goal. value: NTR (lower P/E); growth: NTR (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: NTR (higher dividend yield); quality: NTR (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, NTR leads 12 to 5.
Is AA or NTR cheaper?: On trailing earnings, NTR is cheaper: AA trades at a 15.76 P/E and NTR at 13.34.
Which has grown faster, AA or NTR?: Over the past five years, NTR grew revenue faster — AA at a 5.08% CAGR versus NTR at 5.38%.
Does AA or NTR pay a bigger dividend?: AA yields 0.64% and NTR yields 3.34% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is AA or NTR more profitable?: NTR runs the higher net margin — AA at 8.17% versus NTR at 8.58%.
Which has been the better investment, AA or NTR?: Over the past 5-year, AA delivered the higher annualized total return — AA at 11.84% versus NTR at 4.60%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full AA analysis Full NTR analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Alcoa P/E ratio Nutrien P/E ratio Alcoa dividend yield Nutrien dividend yield Alcoa ROE Nutrien ROE Alcoa operating margin Nutrien operating margin Alcoa revenue growth Nutrien revenue growth Alcoa free cash flow Nutrien free cash flow

Alcoa & Nutrien appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 17, 2026.